Environmental impact assessment of maize cultivation system considering different irrigation methods

Siamo orgogliosi di condividere l’articolo recentemente pubblicato su Journal of Agricultural Engineering. Lo studio analizza l’impatto ambientale della coltivazione del mais da trinciato in relazione a quattro diversi sistemi di irrigazione, utilizzando il metodo Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).

Autori: Filippo Vigo^a, Michele Zoli^a, Daniela Lovarelli^a, Jacopo Bacenetti^a

^aDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of Milan, Italy

Abstract: Maize is a key crop for the livestock sector being able to produce different fodder. Among these, ear maize silage is widely used as an energy source in the diets of pigs, dairy cows and fattening cattle. Given the variability of rainfall, irrigation plays a relevant role to achieve both satisfactory productivity and product quality. In this context, it is essential to explore the sustainability of different irrigation methods for maize cultivation.In this study, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate the environmental impact of maize farms using different irrigation systems: pivot, drip, flood, and hose irrigation. One ton of ear maize silage at 48% moisture content was selected as functional unit and a “from cradle to farm gate” was considered as system boundary . Primary inventory data were collected mainly by surveys and interviews with the farmers. The Environmental Footprint 3.1 method was used to assess 14 impact categories. The results do not allow to clearly identify the best irrigation method across all environmental impact categories, therefore highlighting the need of trade-offs. While yield is the primary driver of environmental impacts, the influence of irrigation remains significant. Climate change was found to range from 116.66 kg CO₂ eq./t of ear maize for flood irrigation to 207.42 kg CO₂ eq./t for hose irrigation. Water use varied from 2178.29 m³ depriv./t for pivot irrigation to 10380.65 m³ depriv./t for flood irrigation. Regarding the contribution analysis, changing the considered environmental impact the main contribution varies, for example nitrous oxide is the main responsible to climate change, ammonia to particulate matter and acidification while nitrate and ammonia emissions to marine eutrophication. In conclusion, this study provides a basis for evaluating different irrigation methods, emphasising that irrigation plays a significant role in the overall environmental impact of maize cultivation, regardless of the end product.